Is There A Way To S From Issuu Free College Textbooks
Copy it and paste the URL wherever you want to.Where do you find the Document ID? If you are using Firefox/Chrome, press Ctrl+U (or go to View » Page Source) to view the source code of the page (in IE you should find in the Page dropdown). Then do a Crtl+F and search for documentId. You’ll find something like this:“documentId” : “090409124522-f5d6aed3b38548dcab8257cbf6487852”,Copy the ID (minus the quotes) and paste it to the first field in the form below:The JPG files on Issuu are stored in this structure:So if you don’t want to use the tool, you can modify the URL yourself.Easy, isn’t it? (Atleast till the time they don’t go about making changes). And since the viewers are in flash downloading the images (you can easily download PDFs if it is not disabled, even if it is you can) are a bit tricky. You could get them from the browser cache, but that process is a bit tedious.Photocopiable unit tests contain additional thematic readings and assess how well students have learned the units reading skills and the units target Download.Our analogy on the best places to get free college textbooks pdf download is a scientific method that looks at various free ebooks online websites that offer pdf textbooks free download with a onetime monthly membership fee or eBooks rental services where students can pay a ridiculously low amount for one pdf version of textbooks that will be 70 less than the price of just one study books.
It only helps if you put your entire publication out via the Issuu iOS Reader (which you probably don’t) and a user of the app decides to subscribe. (In fact, Adobe has stopped developing mobile Flash plugins for any phone.)It’s true that Issuu has a reader app for iOS, but that doesn’t help you when somebody clicks a link to your website from their chosen iPhone Twitter app, for example. Issuu uses Flash, and there is no Flash on those devices. I will be as concise as I can, but the platform has many problems.Let’s start with the most obvious: Nobody visiting your website on an iPhone or iPad will be able to read the work you care so much about.
Even then, there would be reasons to avoid them. Personally, I have had enough seemingly Flash-based problems with Issuu that unless I have a really good reason to want to read some piece of writing presented to me in Issuu—like, maybe my wife wrote it—I usually don’t.A third technological problem with Issuu is that web searches for content you present in Issuu don’t ever lead searchers to your site. By Issuu’s own admission, because they always host the actual content and serve it to your visitors via your embed code, searches that turn up your content will point to issuu.com instead of awesomelitmag.com.Maybe someday Issuu will abandon Flash (which it seems like they will have to) and come up with some unique way of delivering to you the search-engine traffic that should be yours (a task in which I’m sure they have no interest). It crashes often and is notoriously slow and insecure.
The power of the web lies in its consistency across sites: I click a link I’m on a page I’m looking at the content I wanted to see. (Nielsen’s time-tested software interface design principles have been usefully adapted for the web by Keith Instone and Jess McMullin and Grant Skinner, among others) When a website forces users into a full-screen interface in order to read its core content, it violates this critical principle.Second, Issuu’s particular implementation of full-screen reading also requires users to learn a new interface. This makes for a worse user experience (UX) in several ways.First, it’s a long-held tenet of web usability that the interface must prioritize “user control and freedom,” in the words of Jakob Nielsen, the godfather of the field.
All of this must be learned by new users, and re-learned again and again by occasional users. (Click for a larger version.)Issuu’s interface includes not only the many little icons and buttons shown at right, but also a set of controls tied to things like your arrow keys and scroll wheel. (“Follow platform conventions,” writes Nielsen Issuu doesn’t even use a standard Print icon.) Issuu’s many controls.
It’s the only thing—literally the only thing—that every single browser can handle, right down to text browsers and screen-readers for the visually impaired.Speaking of the visually impaired, they can’t use Issuu—not if they’re using the specialized browsers developed for them. Reading is the foundational function of the Internet. Reading is not a new function. Tweeting, for example, or playing and pausing a video. Or really, there is one: because you are providing a new function—and there are plenty of new functions you can provide.
Forcing users who have just clicked a link (from Twitter, say, or from your home page) expecting to read a piece of writing to click again before they can do so is bad form and likely to cost you readers.I would be remiss if I didn’t close by offering you a pair of possible alternatives. In a way, it’s worse (depending on what’s in the building), because while it costs a lot of money to pour a concrete ramp, not using Issuu is absolutely free.Finally, although again it is a fact of the Internet that I will have to click several times to accomplish my browsing goals in any given scenario, it is never a good idea to add extraneous clicks. ( I don’t believe it does.) Failing to do that is the smaller-scale moral equivalent of not having a wheelchair-accessible entrance to your building.
You’re quite right that my goal is a call for something better.One fascinating point of disconnect here is that I wasn’t talking about lit mags that *only* use Issuu I was talking about lit mags that have their own websites and embed individual pieces using Issuu. Literary magazines are made by heroic and talented volunteers: they have day jobs.I hope that people reading this take your suggestion as a call for something BETTER than Issuu, something that has the advantages of Issuu plus the portability and accessibility of PDF — it would not be hard to do, and I think services like Submittable have done a great job making a little bit of money off the niche needs of the literary world — but not a call to avoid Issuu until that better service appears.Thanks very much for your thoughts. Apart from PDFs, which suck, it’s probably even easier to design a real-looking or good-looking magazine page in Issuu than it is in HTML/CSS/on WordPress. The issuu format encourages readers to move through the document front to back, which is desirable for people who intentionally design their magazines for such an experience there is also still a premium placed on print in the literary world (many Issuu magazines are trying to work their way into print).4) Issuu is cheap and easy to use. This gets closer to magazine experience, and further from Web experience, and that’s good, because a magazine is a superior interface to the Web.3) It is important to some editors to make the point that a publication is a magazine, not a blog. Are true for PDFs.3) Issuu is designed to do two things that PDFs and other options can’t: one, force the magazine to a particular size, and two, get rid of scroll bars.
On the web, people are a lot less willing to invest time reading an entire publication. I disagree that the inability to link to individual pieces is a good thing. I think their lack of visibility in my anecdotal universe, at least, speaks to my points about how Issuu makes a mag’s content hard to find.Let me address your points more directly:1.
PDFs do require added learning, too, but most users know what to do because they come across PDFs so often. I agree that PDFs are lousy, but I think they are better than Issuu. This is how I discovered many fine magazines that I read today.2. However, if I *like* a single piece that I read, I am more likely to go back to that magazine in the future.
0 kommentar(er)
